Another article came out about Lance Armstrong, the USA bicyclist that won seven straight Tour De Frances and countless other races, being apart of an anti-doping situation.
I saw this article on ESPN entitled, “Lance Armstrong accuses USADA”, the biking legend finally decided to step up to slience his critics in a scathing lawsuit; stating that the organization, the USADA, broke federal laws and violated its own rules during the investigation that Armstrong had taken illegal drugs.
Armstrong believes that this board doesn’t have enough evidence to support the charges against him.
Now I find this to be a desperation against the bicyclist legend. Do I deny that he possibly did something wrong and illegal? No I don’t. But here is my arugment.
We know Armstrong had testicle cancer. We know he went through the treatment and took steroids to heal. Steroids to help make his body stronger from the cancer. Then we know that about six to eight months after defeating the cancer, he competed in his first Tour De France in 1999.
Now I believe that he took steroids for about half this time in recovery of cancer and to get his body back to normal; but not to cheat as most athletes would.
I haven’t heard things on Armstrong “cheating” until around the time he won his sixth or so Tour De France. And it was just the French that were complaining about it because an American broke one of their record, in my opinion.
It wasn’t until after he retired that we started to see more and more people jumping on board on these accusations. Now it’s bad enough that we’re banning him from competing.
As Armstrong has been saying, he’s never failed a drug test, never admitted to use steroids for competition, etc. etc. Which has caused him to ask, “Where’s the proof?”
Which makes me ask the same thing.
If he has done all of these illegal drugs; where’s the evidence, where’s the beef to back it up? If there is none, sit down and be quiet; if there is, show us what he did wrong.
The only thing that is probably preventing this to happen, is Armstrong’s former teammates. Which I sort of see as proof that Armstrong is hiding something, but the thing is too; where’s the needles? I want to believe something, not this “he said, she said” stuff. You got to prove your case.
Long story short, unless we got solid proof, if he flunked a test, etc. let the guy race. I know were in a global society of “Guilty till proven innocent”, but why are we listening to the French?




Leave a reply to phildangephildange Cancel reply